Publication Date
2016
Document Type
Dissertation/Thesis
First Advisor
Schmidt, Jennifer A. (Jennifer Anne)
Degree Name
Ph.D. (Doctor of Philosophy)
Legacy Department
Department of Leadership, Educational Psychology and Foundations
LCSH
Science teachers; Science students--Attitudes; Science--Philosophy; Teacher-student relationships--Psychological aspects
Abstract
Science teachers have many opportunities to influence their students' science utility value beliefs throughout the course of their instruction. However, many of them refrain from making statements regularly about the usefulness of the content they are teaching, and it is unclear how effective such statements are in influencing student beliefs. This study examined the week-to-week and global relationship between five dimensions of teachers' utility value statements (frequency, clarity, target, purpose, and temporality) and their students' utility value beliefs. The week-to-week relationship was assessed by the clarity of utility value expressed in six essays students produced. More global changes in students' overall valuing of science in general were collected using a pre- and post-survey. The results of both analyses suggest that students respond better to utility value statements that are connected to their goals, decisions, or career aspirations. Some evidence also suggests that students prefer utility value statements that are specific to an individual rather than to a group of students. Finally, students rated science as more useful when their teacher emphasized the moderate to long-term usefulness of the content. These results led to a number of suggestions for further research and implications for teacher practice.
Recommended Citation
Kafkas, Stephen Spaulding, "Why do we need to learn this? : an investigation of the association between science teachers' use of utility value statements and students' immediate and global perceptions of science utility" (2016). Graduate Research Theses & Dissertations. 6718.
https://huskiecommons.lib.niu.edu/allgraduate-thesesdissertations/6718
Extent
ix, 119 pages
Language
eng
Publisher
Northern Illinois University
Rights Statement
In Copyright
Rights Statement 2
NIU theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from Huskie Commons for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without the written permission of the authors.
Media Type
Text
Comments
Advisors: Jennifer A. Schmidt.||Committee members: Amanda M. Durik; Lindsay N. Harris; Lee Shumow; Stephen M. Tonks.