Document Type
Article
Media Type
Text
Abstract
This Note examines the viability of allowing federal courts to consider the state's interest in public safety as a means of continuing the incarceration of a successful habeas corpus petitioner pending appeal. An analysis of Hilton v. Braunskill shows that the guidelines adopted by the Supreme Court to determine when continued incarceration is permissible fail to adequately balance competing state individual interests thereby denying liberty to persons whose state conviction has been rendered void.
First Page
129
Last Page
154
Publication Date
11-1-1988
Department
College of Law
ISSN
0734-1490
Language
eng
Publisher
Northern Illinois University Law Review
Recommended Citation
Adams, Ronald P.
(1988)
"Detaining Successful Habeas Corpus Petitioners Due to Dangerousness: Hilton v. Braunskill,"
Northern Illinois University Law Review: Vol. 9:
Iss.
1, Article 3.
Suggested Citation
Ronald P. Adams, Note, Detaining Successful Habeas Corpus Petitioners Due to Dangerousness: Hilton v. Braunskill, 9 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 129 (1988).