•  
  •  
 

Authors

Phil Dabney

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

A discussion of Hudson v. Palmer, examining the basis for the decision that the fourth amendment does not apply in a prison cell and that an unauthorized, intentional deprivation of property by a state official does not violate due process where adequate post-deprivation remedies exist.

First Page

271

Last Page

306

Publication Date

5-1-1985

Department

College of Law

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.