•  
  •  
 

Authors

Phil Dabney

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

A discussion of Hudson v. Palmer, examining the basis for the decision that the fourth amendment does not apply in a prison cell and that an unauthorized, intentional deprivation of property by a state official does not violate due process where adequate post-deprivation remedies exist.

First Page

271

Last Page

306

Publication Date

5-1-1985

Department

College of Law

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Suggested Citation

Phil Dabney, Note, Hudson v. Palmer: Closing the "Iron Curtain" on Fourth Amendment Protection in Prison Cells, 5 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 271 (1985).

Included in

Law Commons

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.