Document Type
Article
Media Type
Text
Abstract
A discussion of Hudson v. Palmer, examining the basis for the decision that the fourth amendment does not apply in a prison cell and that an unauthorized, intentional deprivation of property by a state official does not violate due process where adequate post-deprivation remedies exist.
First Page
271
Last Page
306
Publication Date
5-1-1985
Department
College of Law
ISSN
0734-1490
Language
eng
Publisher
Northern Illinois University Law Review
Recommended Citation
Dabney, Phil
(1985)
"Hudson v. Palmer: Closing the "Iron Curtain" on Fourth Amendment Protection in Prison Cells,"
Northern Illinois University Law Review: Vol. 5:
Iss.
2, Article 4.
Suggested Citation
Phil Dabney, Note, Hudson v. Palmer: Closing the "Iron Curtain" on Fourth Amendment Protection in Prison Cells, 5 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 271 (1985).
