Document Type
Article
Media Type
Text
Abstract
A discussion of the three analytical approaches-the "all events" test, basis analysis and Section 636 analysis applied by the courts in evaluating the benefits of non-recourse financing as a tax shelter.
First Page
153
Last Page
178
Publication Date
11-1-1983
Department
College of Law
ISSN
0734-1490
Language
eng
Publisher
Northern Illinois University Law Review
Recommended Citation
Biegel, Gregory A.
(1983)
"Nonrecourse Financing: Does it Still Generate Tax Advantages After Gibson Products Co. v. United States and Brountas v. Commissioner?,"
Northern Illinois University Law Review: Vol. 4:
Iss.
1, Article 5.
Suggested Citation
Gregory A. Biegel, Comment, Nonrecourse Financing: Does it Still Generate Tax Advantages After Gibson Products Co. v. United States and Brountas v. Commissioner?, 4 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 153 (1983).
