•  
  •  
 

Authors

Richard Schmack

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

This Article will discuss the obligations and duties of a prosecutor in reviewing post-conviction claims of actual innocence in the context of the DeKalb County case of People v. Jack McCullough. In my role as State's Attorney, the chief prosecutor, I was required to formulate a response to the Defendant's claim of innocence. Ultimately, I reached the conclusion that he was innocent of the crime for which he had been convicted, and thereafter proactively participated in his exoneration. This Article will begin with a general discussion of the principles which apply to a prosecutor's assessment of claims of actual innocence, and of evidence of innocence which may come to the prosecutor's attention in the absence of a pending petition. The Article will then move on to a summary of the facts of the McCullough case, and conclude with my assessment of how those rules governed my ultimate conclusion of innocence and the disposition of the case.

First Page

420

Last Page

443

Publication Date

6-1-2017

Department

Other

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.