•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

In Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court struck down the decades-old coverage formula that triggered section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Before the ink was dry on that opinion, efforts were underway to breathe new life into section 5. Calls for a legislative solution were immediate, and soon after that legislation creating a new coverage formula was proposed. Additionally, the Department of Justice brought a lawsuit that, if successful, will require the State of Texas to once again submit to preclearance. Thus, the issue that the Supreme Court avoided in Shelby County “ the constitutionality of section 5 “ could soon reappear. This Article addresses that eventuality and takes aim at only the most controversial aspect of section 5”the effects test. The effects test requires preclearance denial where a voting change will have an unequal impact on racial groups. The effects test is unconstitutional for two reasons. First, because the effects test stands independent from section 5's ban on intentionally discriminatory voting practices, it is not a congruent and proportional means of enforcing the Fifteenth Amendment. Second, because the effects test is used almost exclusively to gerrymander districts along racial lines, it violates the Equal Protection Clause. If section 5 is to remain a tool to eliminate discrimination in voting, then updating the coverage formula to address contemporary discrimination is only the first step. Equally important is ensuring that it is used to eliminate intentional discrimination in voting. Recognizing that the effects test perverts that prohibition could avoid the legal challenges that are sure to come.

First Page

585

Last Page

606

Publication Date

7-1-2014

Department

Other

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Suggested Citation

Joshua P. Thompson, Towards a Post-Shelby County Section 5 Where a Constitutional Coverage Formula Does Not Reauthorize the Effects Test, 34 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 585 (2014).

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.