•  
  •  
 

Authors

Alyssa Freeman

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

This Note examines Abraham and Veneklasen Joint Venture v. American Quarter Horse Association, in which a United States district court ruled that the American Quarter Horse Association™s rule banning clones of registered quarter horses from also being registered violated section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The author explores potential procompetitive justifications that AQHA has established for its rule, including the negative impact clones would likely have on the genetic variation of the breed and genetic diseases. The author argues that the district court erred by overlooking the plausibility of the justifications and that the rule of reason analysis should have been conducted. Finally, the author concludes that AQHA, like other associations that essentially create the product in question, must be afforded the opportunity to present procompetitive benefits and have these benefits considered by the court.

First Page

607

Last Page

642

Publication Date

7-1-2014

Department

College of Law

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.