•  
  •  
 

Authors

Jessica Harrill

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

Ever since electronic books and their e-readers hit the market, there has been a near constant struggle between the e-book retailers and the publishers on who should set the price for each e-book. In 2011, when Apple decided to join the e-reader battle, the publishers changed their pricing scheme with all e-book retailers, giving the publishers most of the power. An investigation by the Department of Justice into Apple and five of the six major publishing companies led to an antitrust suit for fixing prices that most publishers have since settled out of court. This Comment argues that one specific clause in the settlement, allowing e-book retailers more freedom to pick its own prices for two years without publisher interference, will contribute to the problem the Department of Justice is attempting to prevent. While the settlement removes the price-fixing problems brought about by the publishers' actions, this Comment explains how the two year ban on publisher interference with prices will hurt the literary industry in the long run. To do this, the Comment will show that allowing major e-book retailers an opportunity to lower their prices significantly and gain a monopoly over others not equipped to handle the low prices might lead.

First Page

189

Last Page

220

Publication Date

9-1-2013

Department

College of Law

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.