•  
  •  
 

Authors

Kelly Moore

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

The tax code bestows various benefits upon married taxpayers based on the presumption that married individuals form a single economic unit and should be taxed accordingly. This article explores this presumption in cases where the married individuals' interactions are governed by a prenuptial agreement. Should married taxpayers be treated as economic units when they have entered an agreement allowing them to deviate from the state law burdens of marriage otherwise imposed? This article explores this question in the context of the estate tax marital deduction, which allows a 100% deduction for the value of property passing from a decedent to a surviving spouse, so long as the property passes outright or in a statute sanctioned form to the decedent's surviving spouse. The discussion requires an exploration of the historical origins of the estate tax marital deduction and a survey of common terms found in prenuptial agreements. A simple declaration that the tax benefits should be denied when the burdens of marriage are sufficiently avoided begs the questions: (1) what level of deviation from state law imposed burdens should trigger denial of the 100% estate tax marital deduction, and (2) if denied, should the predecessor to the 100% deduction be employed, or should some other deduction regime be created for this scenario? Because of the inherent complexities evinced by these follow-up questions, the article concludes that, although policy arguments may support denying the deduction in certain situations, practical considerations demand that the tax benefits not be impacted by the presence of a prenuptial agreement.

First Page

255

Last Page

292

Publication Date

2-1-2013

Department

Other

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Suggested Citation

Kelly Moore, The Curious Case of Dr. Jekyll and the Estate Tax Marital Deduction: Should Prenuptial Agreements Alter the Relationship?, 33 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 255 (2013).

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.