•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

International transactions involve an array of risks. A persistent risk in individual commercial transactions occurs when parties do not know each other well enough to trust each other. Letters of credit and bank guarantees manage this transaction risk by shifting it onto trusted independent third parties. The value of these instruments rests upon the reliability of performance by such third parties, and that depends, in part, on the degree of judicial reluctance to enjoin their performance. To the extent one party to an underlying transaction believes the other can control the third party through injunction, the value of the third party™s obligation diminishes. Until recently, the circumstances under which a court could be persuaded to enjoin the operation of letters of credit and bank guarantees were limited almost entirely to some sort of fraud. Over the last several years, courts in a number of common law jurisdictions have begun to recognize unconscionability and illegality as new, fairness-based exceptions to this third-party independence. This article chronicles the evolution and spread of these new exceptions, and examines the threat their exaltation of fairness over contractual certainty poses to the utility of letters of credit and bank guarantees.

First Page

297

Last Page

338

Publication Date

4-1-2011

Department

Other

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.