•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

481 In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court in Granholm v. Heald reexamined the interplay between the dormant Commerce Clause and the Twenty-first Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Granholm caused many states, including Illinois, to reexamine their regulation of liquor distribution and the shipment of wine into their jurisdictions. Based on Granholm, Illinois created a new winery shipper's license to enable out-of-state wineries could ship to Illinois consumers; however, in its creation, Illinois removed the longstanding ability of out-of-state wine retailers to ship to Illinois consumers. This Comment examines the implications of the dormant Commerce Clause on Illinois' new license in light of Granholm v. Heald. This Comment also examines two conflicting opinions, Arnold Wines, Inc. v. Boyle and Siesta Village Market, LLC v. Granholm, in which the court analyzed similar New York and Michigan liquor distribution regulations under Granholn. Finally, this Comment concludes that the winery shipper's license is a constitutional use of Illinois' powers under the Twenty-first Amendment and does not violate established dormant Commerce Clause jurisprudence.

First Page

481

Last Page

507

Publication Date

5-1-2010

Department

College of Law

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.