Document Type


Media Type



481 In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court in Granholm v. Heald reexamined the interplay between the dormant Commerce Clause and the Twenty-first Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Granholm caused many states, including Illinois, to reexamine their regulation of liquor distribution and the shipment of wine into their jurisdictions. Based on Granholm, Illinois created a new winery shipper's license to enable out-of-state wineries could ship to Illinois consumers; however, in its creation, Illinois removed the longstanding ability of out-of-state wine retailers to ship to Illinois consumers. This Comment examines the implications of the dormant Commerce Clause on Illinois' new license in light of Granholm v. Heald. This Comment also examines two conflicting opinions, Arnold Wines, Inc. v. Boyle and Siesta Village Market, LLC v. Granholm, in which the court analyzed similar New York and Michigan liquor distribution regulations under Granholn. Finally, this Comment concludes that the winery shipper's license is a constitutional use of Illinois' powers under the Twenty-first Amendment and does not violate established dormant Commerce Clause jurisprudence.

First Page


Last Page


Publication Date



College of Law






Northern Illinois University Law Review

Suggested Citation

Christopher G. Sparks, Comment, Out-of-State Wine Retailers Corked: How the Illinois General Assembly Limits Direct Wine Shipments from Out-of-State Retailers to Illinois Oenophiles and Why the Commerce Clause Will Not Protect Them, 30 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 481 (2010).

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.