•  
  •  
 

Authors

Mark J. Sobczak

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

This article examines the origins, structure, and consequent effectiveness of the recently enacted Illinois Citizen Participation Act. Designed to combat a particular breed of vexatious litigation known as "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation," or "SLAPPs," the Citizen Participation Act conditionally immunizes potential civil defendants from liability when they are sued for acts implicating their First Amendment rights. The article briefly examines the nature of SLAPPs, why they stand contrary to public policy, and outlines some proposed solutions to eliminate or reduce their use. The article then explores the substantive and procedural mechanisms employed by Illinois to bring about the objectives behind the new law. After comparing the Citizen Participation Act to similar laws passed in other states, it becomes apparent that the broad language and applicability of the Act, coupled with its one-sided remedial mechanisms, presents a significant risk of destabilizing the fine balance of adversarial rights held by civil plaintiffs and defendants in Illinois--a balance the Act, on its face, seeks to protect. Finally, the article offers two relatively simple solutions that, if enacted, would help ensure the Citizen Participation Act successfully attains its goal of creating a more equitable and democratic judicial process for all.

First Page

559

Last Page

592

Publication Date

7-1-2008

Department

College of Law

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.