Document Type


Media Type



In the end, democratic theory rests upon notions of market efficiency. Elections, like markets, involve the expression of preferences by numerous participants in the hope that collective judgments are a superior means of choosing policies, and ultimately laws, that will best serve the common weal. Yet, like markets, elections can yield distorted outcomes if the fundamental mechanisms of democracy are distorted. In the United States today democracy suffers from manifold distortions. Among these distortions are the role of money in our democracy, the ability of those who govern to manipulate the governed (even to the point of representatives selecting voters through gerrymandering), and flawed media. This article will focus on a more basic and more disturbing distortion-the reluctance of the governing to assure that votes are tabulated in a fair and non-partisan way. It is difficult to imagine a more fundamental breakdown of democracy. This article will show that this foundational flaw plagues American democracy today and seeks to explain why this persists in spite of a history of expansionary democracy. The article concludes that it is likely the outcome of increased inequality in America combined with the impact of racial stigma.

First Page


Last Page


Publication Date









Northern Illinois University Law Review

Suggested Citation

Steven Ramirez and Aliza Organick, Taking Voting Rights Seriously: Race and the Integrity of Democracy in America, 27 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 427 (2007).

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.