•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

The article posits that judicial interpretations have virtually eliminated many impairments, such as alcoholism, from protection under the Americans with Disabilities Act, contrary to obvious Congressional intent. While this phenomenon is not limited to alcoholism, it is a useful illustration of the damage judicial activism has caused in this area. In enacting the ADA, Congress was particularly concerned about "stereotypic assumptions" that created myths and fears about disabled people. Alcoholics are often subjected to discrimination because of such assumptions and because they are not perceived as having a "real" illness. Moreover, Congress referred to alcoholism many times in the legislative history and included a specific reference to alcoholism in the statute. For these reasons, alcoholism illustrates the extreme difficulty of proving a disability under the current case law. Once employers discover that their employees with impairments, such as alcoholism, are no longer protected by the ADA, such employees may be terminated with impunity. The cost of this eventuality is high in economic, and especially, human, terms.

First Page

169

Last Page

246

Publication Date

5-1-2007

Department

Other

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.