Document Type


Media Type



One might instinctively think, as suggested by several commentators, that section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a race-based remedy imposed by Congress on state and local governments, has a good chance of being declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. This is because, in recent years, the Court has shown a general hostility to race-based remedies and to laws that impose federal requirements on state and local governments. The author, however, identifies three core values to demonstrate that section 2 remains clearly constitutional even in light of these trends. The first is that racial discrimination in voting is a context in which the Court will allow Congress greater leeway to impose race-based requirements on state and local governments; the second is that section 2 comes pretty close to conforming to the Court's view of what amounts to a proper use of a race-based remedy; and the third is that section 2 does not amount to a much greater intrusion on state and local governments than the Constitution itself.

First Page


Last Page


Publication Date









Northern Illinois University Law Review

Suggested Citation

Michael J. Pitts, Congressional Enforcement of Affirmative Democracy Through Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 25 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 185 (2005).

Included in

Law Commons


To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.