•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

The authors raise the serious problems inherent in the use of eyewitness identification of defendants in criminal trials. They suggest that allowing expert testimony on its unreliability is essential to counteract possible adverse effects on the jury's determination of guilt.

First Page

59

Last Page

86

Publication Date

11-1-1981

Department

Other

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Suggested Citation

Edward B. Arnolds, William K. Carroll and Michael P. Seng, The Admissibility of Expert Testimony on the Issue of Eyewitness Identification in Criminal Trials, 2 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 59 (1981).

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.