•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

The resolution of bankruptcy litigation involving individuals under the governmental student loan programs and family farmers under Chapter 12 of the Bankruptcy Code provides an intriguing insight into congressional policy. That divergence is especially prominent in the treatment of "disposable income" under these two statutory provisions. When deciding issues relating to whether income should go to unsecured creditors or be used to offset future farming costs, courts tend to interpret the Code in favor of debtors; conversely, the Code creates, and courts perpetuate through their rulings, a clear presumption against discharging student loan obligations. The debtor will prevail only if at "undue hardship" can be shown. This paper looks at these 'fresh start" differences by analyzing legislative history and case law and making recommendations, including suggested statutory revisions, in order to offer a more balanced and equitable treatment of the two debtor groups.

First Page

25

Last Page

76

Publication Date

11-1-1995

Department

Other

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.