Document Type


Media Type



Growing tensions between government efforts to require private property use or development in ways that promote the health, safety, and general quality of life within our communities are exacerbated by the so-called "Takings" cases. In Dolan v. City of Tigard, the United States Supreme Court declared a local condition of approval of a development permit to be insufficiently supported by the findings of the city. This article discusses how this decision seriously undermines the traditional presumption of validity of local Planned Unit development permit decisions and imposes a level of proof about such conditions which may result in denials of good development proposals with solvable problems. Flexibility by local governments in permitting valuable development while mitigating health and safety problems through specific conditions must meet a "rough proportionality" test that many small jurisdictions will be hard pressed to establish. Mutual realization by local government and developers of the downside of the "takings" decisions will lead to improved use Planned Unit Development amid other flexibility tools ii local zoning and land use control.

First Page


Last Page


Publication Date









Northern Illinois University Law Review

Suggested Citation

Clyde W. Forrest, Planned Unit Development and Takings Post Dolan, 15 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 571 (1995).

Included in

Law Commons


To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.