•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

Growing tensions between government efforts to require private property use or development in ways that promote the health, safety, and general quality of life within our communities are exacerbated by the so-called "Takings" cases. In Dolan v. City of Tigard, the United States Supreme Court declared a local condition of approval of a development permit to be insufficiently supported by the findings of the city. This article discusses how this decision seriously undermines the traditional presumption of validity of local Planned Unit development permit decisions and imposes a level of proof about such conditions which may result in denials of good development proposals with solvable problems. Flexibility by local governments in permitting valuable development while mitigating health and safety problems through specific conditions must meet a "rough proportionality" test that many small jurisdictions will be hard pressed to establish. Mutual realization by local government and developers of the downside of the "takings" decisions will lead to improved use Planned Unit Development amid other flexibility tools ii local zoning and land use control.

First Page

571

Last Page

584

Publication Date

7-1-1995

Department

Other

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.