Document Type
Article
Media Type
Text
Abstract
This note examines the United States Supreme Court decision finding a private litigant's use of peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on account of race in a civil case constituted "state action" and violated the excluded jurors' equal protection rights. The author examines the Court's decision and concludes that the finding of "state action" was not based on reasoned jurisprudence.
First Page
497
Last Page
525
Publication Date
5-1-1992
Department
College of Law
ISSN
0734-1490
Language
eng
Publisher
Northern Illinois University Law Review
Recommended Citation
Olson, Frederick V.
(1992)
"Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.: Reasoned or Result Oriented Jurisprudence?,"
Northern Illinois University Law Review: Vol. 12:
Iss.
2, Article 5.
Suggested Citation
Frederick V. Olson, Note, Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.: Reasoned or Result Oriented Jurisprudence?, 12 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 497 (1992).
