•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

This note examines the Illinois Supreme Court case which decided whether a mother could be held liable to her child for negligent infliction of prenatal injuries. This case pitted the interests of a fetus in being born with a sound mind and body against a mother's right to personal autonomy. After weighing the merits of these competing claims, and assessing the implications of an opposite conclusion, the supreme court held that the rights of the mother were superior to the interests of her fetus. This note explores the soundness of the court's decision to reject maternal prenatal civil liability and assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the opinion. The author concludes that the court's decision was correct because to impose civil liability for a mother's prenatal torts possesses significant dangers to a woman's personal autonomy and bodily integrity.

First Page

409

Last Page

444

Publication Date

7-1-1991

Department

College of Law

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.