•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

This note examines the United States Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of sobriety roadblocks. The issue facing the Court was whether the initial stop of motorists passing through a sobriety roadblock and the associated preliminary questioning and observation by police officers violated the fourth amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Court held that the initial stop and questioning at sobriety roadblocks did not violate the fourth amendment. This note analyzes the evolution of suspicionless seizures and concludes that because roadblocks subject drivers to seizure without probable cause or reasonable suspicion, their constitutionality under the fourth amendment is questionable.

First Page

349

Last Page

374

Publication Date

7-1-1991

Department

College of Law

ISSN

0734-1490

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University Law Review

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.