Publication Date
1968
Document Type
Dissertation/Thesis
First Advisor
Tucker, Charles O.
Degree Name
M.A. (Master of Arts)
Legacy Department
Department of Speech
LCSH
Comprehension--Testing
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to conduct initial research into the measurement of the concept of understanding. The specific purpose of this investigation was to validate the semantic differential and the Taylor Cloze Procedure as measures of two constructs of understanding: the ability of the receiver to apply concepts as the source would apply them in a message, and the ability to know or predict attitudes of the source toward concepts in a message, or toward related concepts. This investigation further attempted to determine if receivers judgments of the understandability of a message would correspond with expert judgments of a message as being either highly understandable or of low understandability. This was done by means of a Personal Estimate of Understanding. Two messages were selected on the basis of expert judgments: one message was judged to be highly understandable, the other to be of low understandability. These two messages became the two treatment variables. The taped messages were played to two groups of Speech 100 students at Northern Illinois University. The subjects were asked to fill out three measures after listening to the messages: the semantic differential as if they were the speaker, the Taylor Cloze Procedure, and the Estimate of personal Understanding. The scores obtained by subjects on these measures were computed for F values. The .05 level of confidence was chosen for the determination of significant differences in the scores.
Recommended Citation
Katula, Richard Allen, "A validation of two measures of the concept of understanding" (1968). Graduate Research Theses & Dissertations. 931.
https://huskiecommons.lib.niu.edu/allgraduate-thesesdissertations/931
Extent
91 pages
Language
eng
Publisher
Northern Illinois University
Rights Statement
In Copyright
Rights Statement 2
NIU theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from Huskie Commons for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without the written permission of the authors.
Media Type
Text
Comments
Includes bibliographical references.