Publication Date

2019

Document Type

Dissertation/Thesis

First Advisor

Pillow, Bradford H.

Degree Name

M.A. (Master of Arts)

Legacy Department

Department of Psychology

Abstract

This investigation examines scientific reasoning among elementary school students by assessing experiment and evidence evaluation. Previous studies have not fully distinguished these two abilities. The present study directly compared experiment and evidence evaluation within the same task and also examined the recognition of confounded variables.

Using a modified version of a science reasoning procedure, students in first-, third-, and fifth-grade (N = 54) were presented with two sets of problems: (a) 1-Variable problems examined recognition of the difference between conclusive and inconclusive tests, and (b) 2-Variable problems further assessed recognition that confounded variables make an experiment inconclusive. For the 1-Variable condition, a 3 x 3 x 2 (Age x Gender x Judgment) ANOVA did not reveal any significant effects. All age groups performed significantly better than chance for evidence evaluation, but not for experiment evaluation. In the 2-Variable condition there was an Age effect: third- and fifth-grade students performed better than the first-graders, and also performed above chance for both confounded and unconfounded problems.

The patterns of performance across all age groups suggest that: (a) basic scientific reasoning abilities emerge gradually during elementary school, (b) experiment and evidence evaluation may be distinct at least for some problems, and (c) reasoning about multiple variables and confounded experiments may require advanced skills.

Extent

83 pages

Language

eng

Publisher

Northern Illinois University

Rights Statement

In Copyright

Rights Statement 2

NIU theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from Huskie Commons for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without the written permission of the authors.

Media Type

Text

Share

COinS