Publication Date
1984
Document Type
Dissertation/Thesis
First Advisor
Shearer, William M.
Degree Name
M.A. (Master of Arts)
Legacy Department
Department of Communicative Disorders
LCSH
Peabody picture vocabulary test; Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language; Children--Language--Testing
Abstract
This study was designed to explore the relationship between two of the most commonly used tests of receptive language skills. The two tests—Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised and the Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language—are frequently used by school clinicians in kindergarten screening. However, the relationship between the tests has never been established. In addition, three contrasting groups—males vs. females, white students vs. non-white students, and morning students vs. afternoon students—were studied to determine if the differences in mean performances were statistically significant. The subjects were 60 kindergarten children enrolled in three elementary schools in Rockford (Illinois). Both tests were administered to each student. There were significant correlations between the two tests—ranging from .73 to .90—indicating consistently strong relationships within all three of the school populations. There was no significant difference between the performances of males and females or between the performances of morning students and afternoon students. However, there was a significant difference in the performances of white students and non-white students.
Recommended Citation
Diekelman, Suzanne M., "A study of the relationship between the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised and the Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language" (1984). Graduate Research Theses & Dissertations. 764.
https://huskiecommons.lib.niu.edu/allgraduate-thesesdissertations/764
Extent
vi, 68 pages
Language
eng
Publisher
Northern Illinois University
Rights Statement
In Copyright
Rights Statement 2
NIU theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from Huskie Commons for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without the written permission of the authors.
Media Type
Text
Comments
Bibliography: pages 63-68.