Publication Date
1983
Document Type
Dissertation/Thesis
First Advisor
Williams, Sarah Elizabeth, 1956-
Degree Name
M.A. (Master of Arts)
Legacy Department
Department of Communicative Disorders
LCSH
Aphasic persons--Language
Abstract
The effect of homogeneity versus heterogeneity of stimulus grouping on the confrontation-naming performance of adult aphasics was examined in this study. The subjects were divided into fluent and nonfluent groups. Each subject was tested under two conditions: homogeneous (all items selected from one semantic category) and heterogeneous (items selected from a variety of semantic categories). No significant differences in confrontation-naming performance were found for either group between the two conditions, although a trend toward better scores on the homogeneous condition was exhibited by the nonfluent group. Differences in response latencies for the aphasic groups in the two test conditions were also nonsignificant, although both groups had shorter latencies when responding to homogeneous test items. Fluent aphasics were affected by order of presentation of the test conditions, performing better on the one presented last. Fluent subjects made significantly fewer overall errors per subject than did nonfluent subjects. Patterns of error types for the two groups were examined and characteristic error types were found for both fluent and nonfluent groups. Related word errors were found to occur significantly more often than expected in both groups. Results of this study are discussed as they relate to the concept of semantic organization of language in the brain. Clinical implications are also addressed.
Recommended Citation
Wright, Judy M., "The effect of homogenous versus heterogeneous stimuli on the confrontation-naming performance of aphasics by Judy M. Wright" (1983). Graduate Research Theses & Dissertations. 5518.
https://huskiecommons.lib.niu.edu/allgraduate-thesesdissertations/5518
Extent
vi, 48 pages
Language
eng
Publisher
Northern Illinois University
Rights Statement
In Copyright
Rights Statement 2
NIU theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from Huskie Commons for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without the written permission of the authors.
Media Type
Text
Comments
Bibliography: pages 46-48.