Publication Date
1996
Document Type
Dissertation/Thesis
First Advisor
Digby-Junger, Richard
Degree Name
M.A. (Master of Arts)
Legacy Department
Department of Journalism
LCSH
Freedom of the press--United States; Libel and slander--United States
Abstract
Fair Comment, now considered an effective legal defense against libel, evolved through the social and political developments in England, and the United States. The most important criterion in Milkovich v. Lorain Journal is whether the material in question is an "actionable assertion" or a "pure opinion," which is non-actionable. The criteria for deciding this changes over time. It has incorporated some old and some new standards of deciding between fact and opinion. As it stands today after the generally considered landmark case, Milkovich, the distinction between fact and opinion is dependent upon the nature of language, the broader context of the statements, verifiability of facts and sometimes even the state defamation laws. The major achievement of Milkovich is its demolition of the belief that all true opinions are protected while the courts continue to combine pre- and post-Milkovich standards in deciding defamation cases.
Recommended Citation
Bose, Jayita, "The defense of fair comment : how well does it work?" (1996). Graduate Research Theses & Dissertations. 5398.
https://huskiecommons.lib.niu.edu/allgraduate-thesesdissertations/5398
Extent
70 pages
Language
eng
Publisher
Northern Illinois University
Rights Statement
In Copyright
Rights Statement 2
NIU theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from Huskie Commons for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without the written permission of the authors.
Media Type
Text
Comments
Includes bibliographical references (pages 68-70)