Publication Date
1967
Document Type
Dissertation/Thesis
First Advisor
Kieso, Donald E.||Eiteman, Dean S.
Degree Name
M.S. (Master of Science)
Legacy Department
Department of Accountancy
LCSH
Financial statements
Abstract
Despite the importance of the doctrine of materiality in external financial reporting, a satisfactory definition of materiality and a theoretical guideline for judging materiality have yet to be submitted. The basic purposes of this study were threefold: (1) to establish a theoretical justification for the adoption of the doctrine of materiality; (2) to develop a theoretical guideline for judging materiality; and (3) to develop a new definition of materiality—all three relative to the communication of financial information to the investor group. Two justifications proposed by some accountants were also evaluated in this study. The data for this study was obtained from the following sources: periodical literature and related studies; the publications of the American Accounting Association; and the publications of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The following major conclusions were drawn regarding the adoption of the doctrine of materiality in the communication of financial information to the investor group: (1) Both justifications, (a) savings in bookkeeping cost and (b) separating the important information from the unimportant, fail to expose any logical guideline for judging materiality. Financial information is used for comprehending and evaluating the consequences of investment alternatives. It is pertinent to treat expediently some items, facts, or statements if their disclosure would not make a difference in an average investor's comprehension and evaluation. Hence, accountants are justified in adopting the doctrine of materiality to screen financial information. (2) The guideline for judging the materiality of an item, fact, or statement of financial information should be that the knowledge of such information would make a difference in an average investor's comprehension and evaluation of the consequences of investing in a particular corporation. (3) The following statement is submitted as a pertinent definition of materiality: An item, fact, or statement of financial information is material, if the knowledge of such information would make a difference or change in an average investor's comprehension and evaluation of the consequences of investing in a particular corporation. The materiality of such information refers to its character of being material.
Recommended Citation
Fong, Siew-low, "Materiality in external financial reporting" (1967). Graduate Research Theses & Dissertations. 3898.
https://huskiecommons.lib.niu.edu/allgraduate-thesesdissertations/3898
Extent
ii, 51 pages
Language
eng
Publisher
Northern Illinois University
Rights Statement
In Copyright
Rights Statement 2
NIU theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from Huskie Commons for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without the written permission of the authors.
Media Type
Text
Comments
Includes bibliographical references.