Publication Date
2016
Document Type
Dissertation/Thesis
First Advisor
Malecki, Christine K.
Degree Name
Ph.D. (Doctor of Philosophy)
Legacy Department
Department of Psychology
LCSH
Oral reading--Ability testing; Readers; Individualized education programs; Fluency (Language learning); Educational psychology; Reading instruction
Abstract
Recent legislation such as No Child Left Behind and the Performance Evaluation Reform Act (PERA) increasingly pressure teachers and schools to be accountable for instructional time in the form of improved test scores. As a result, students are given an increasing variety of assessments in a given school year in an attempt to measure academic growth over time. These assessments frequently occur in the form of curriculum-based measures (CBM) of oral reading fluency, informal reading inventories (IRIs), computer adaptive tests (CATs) of reading, and annual high stakes assessments of reading ability. While a review of the literature reveals a well-established relationship between CBMs, IRIs, and high stakes assessments, less empirical evidence exists that illustrates the relationship between and technical adequacy of CBMs, IRIs, and CATs of reading ability. Specifically, the current study examined the concurrent and predictive validity of CBMs and IRIs on computer adaptive assessments in students in second through fifth grade. Further, given the increasing diversity of student populations, the current study sought to examine the extent to which one's status as an English Learner or student with an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) moderates the relationships between oral reading fluency and CATs and IRIs and CATs.
Recommended Citation
Perry, Paul J., "Differences among subgroups in concurrent and predictive validity of timed oral reading fluency measures and informal reading inventories on performance on computer adaptive assessments of reading" (2016). Graduate Research Theses & Dissertations. 2227.
https://huskiecommons.lib.niu.edu/allgraduate-thesesdissertations/2227
Extent
133 pages
Language
eng
Publisher
Northern Illinois University
Rights Statement
In Copyright
Rights Statement 2
NIU theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from Huskie Commons for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without the written permission of the authors.
Media Type
Text
Comments
Advisors: Christine K. Malecki.||Committee members: Vicki Collins; Michelle Demaray; Joe Magliano; Vinita Menon; Julia Ogg.