Publication Date

Spring 5-4-2025

Document Type

Student Project

First Advisor

Hamayotsu, Kikue

Degree Name

B.A. (Bachelor of Arts)

Department

Department of Political Science

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explain the potential gaps in U.S. state-level policies from Illinois, Utah, and California. The scope of this paper focuses on policies that specifically address the emerging issue of child influencers. Through a comparative analysis, I found that states like Illinois, California, and Utah all lack enforcement mechanisms, which rational choice theory explains are crucial for ensuring policy effectiveness. Many states, such as California and Utah, followed Illinois’s legal framework through policy diffusion. Therefore, I propose that, in order for states to adopt stronger measures, they should implement France’s more developed legal framework. Through this framework, I outlined four recommendations that states can utilize.

Share

COinS