Document Type

Article

Media Type

Text

Abstract

The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, as well as recent advances in our understanding of human reproduction, has prompted new dialogue on the legal status of the unborn and on the level of legal protection appropriate for potential human life. In joining the dialogue, this commentary is prompted by several concerns. First, the landmark decision in Roe v. Wade has frequently been misunderstood, creating much confusion over the permissible boundaries of protecting potential human life. A debate about laws pertaining to the unborn must be founded upon a proper understanding of what the Supreme Court said and did in Roe. Second, since the Roe decision, the legal protections afforded the unborn have expanded. Yet many of the changes are unrelated to the Roe decision or to abortion generally. These changes are often interesting and controversial, but are shielded from public view. While the need for significant change in the legal status of the unborn still exists, many of the changes will not be driven by U.S. Supreme Court pronouncements on abortion. Thus, contemporary debates about the unborn should continue, but the debates should include a more thorough consideration of laws outside the abortion context. Third, a review of American laws demonstrates that current legal treatment of the unborn is both inconsistent and inadequate. Such failings should corrected.

Publication Date

1-1-1990

Department

College of Law

Language

eng

Rights Statement

In Copyright

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.